I agree. My interest in the stories D.C. is telling is definitely on the upswing. The "Truth" storyline is a great example of the lack of quality editorial oversight at D.C. which often leads me to frustration. Someone should have, at some point, mentioned that perhaps telling the story out of sequence wasn't the best way to go about it. I've liked what I've read of Yang's "Superman", but ultimately the story lacks teeth because the moment we're building toward has been spoiled. That said, I do want to focus on the positive, and there IS plenty of it.ComicTrekker wrote:I've been pleasantly surprised by the new batch of titles...
I was surprised by how much I enjoyed JLA #1, storywise. Once again, as you pointed out, the presentation was somewhat botched. The characters very much felt to me like their early-New 52 counterparts. This story could easily have taken place during that period. The League seemed rather raw and undisciplined. With the current "Truth" arc in Superman's books, the secret identity outing provided no tension. And again, if the writers of the League titles aren't respecting the costume changes we're seeing in Batman, Superman, and Wonder Woman, where's my incentive to assume they could be permanent?ComicTrekker wrote:I agree with John and Drew's take on JLA #1. I was disappointed in the issue and found it somewhat bland, and am also frustrated that it doesn't tie in with current continuity.
I also enjoyed the first issue of Jeff Parker's JLU, a title which has been very poorly treated thus far in my opinion. I would have liked a little more set-up and explanation (for instance, why Swamp Thing and Poison Ivy were specially recruited to something that obliterates flora, and why Adam Strange's disembodied spirit is playing Maxwell Lord), but it left me wanting to read the next issue.
Justice League 3001 #1 was fun, although Giffen and Dematteis unfortunately continued their string of consecutive issues introducing new characters to about 8. (At least, that's how it seems.) The book started with such great potential, but I'm concerned for its longevity.